An apologetically me, we’re in the same boat, my son is in his second year of medical school and I’ve been trying to from the beginning of the whole pandemic madness warn him about what these shots were all about, sadly he got the two Pfizer doses back in 2021 while in his undergraduate school but since he seemed to have realized that it was a mistake to have gotten them although I worry constantly about what he could be coerced to do while in medical school and like you I’m constantly sending links to him to articles like these ones of Dr Campbell’s and praying to God to keep my beloved son as well as so many others in the same situation out of harms way🙏🏻
Thank you for sharing this. I find what often helps is to point out the censorship-- it has been extreme and powerful (and I often get into the weeds on Missouri v. Biden.) This excerpt transcribed below was not censored, but it's an example of how people, in this case, Dr. Campbell, have often had to go extremes to get around the censors.
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: On his popular YouTube channel Dr. John Campbell discusses and educates on matters related to covid. Since the Pfizer document dump https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents starting in 2021 [ https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents ] he has become increasingly alarmed and critical of government policy in regards to covid jabs, however he has always been extremely careful to avoid triggering YouTube's censorship. He uses the word "jag" instead of jab, for example, and in one crucial instance, he simply says nothing while staring pointedly into the camera.
TRANSCRIPT OF BRIEF EXCERPT
5:09
DR. JOHN CAMPBELL: [quoting newspaper] "Covid Scotland"-- This is another well-known Scottish NEWSPAPER, The Herald, reporting-- [quoting newspaper] "Covid Scotland: Vaccines ruled out in neonatal deaths spike" according to this report from the Herald.
[quoting newspaper] "Public health experts ruled out any link between spikes in neonatal deaths and the Covid vaccine".
But the Herald does note, this was [quoting newspaper] "without checking whether any of the infants' mothers had received the jag during pregnancy."
[quoting newspaper] "Experts stressed, no 'plausible' link to justify investigation of maternal vaccination status."
So they're saying there's no need to investigate the mums' vaccine status in these babies that have tragically died in the neonatal period. This is not necessary.
[quoting newspaper] "Public Health Scotland said its consultants had given 'careful consideration' to the 'potential benefits and harms' of carrying out such an analysis as part of its probe into the tragic deaths of 39 infants.'"
But concluded against doing so.
Public Health Scotland added— this is, so the Herald's got this from different bits and bobs from the Freedom of Information requests and other statements. They put it together.
[quoting newspaper] "A risk that 'identifying the vaccination status of the mother, even at aggregate level"
So in other words, that's not individuals [?] numbers, even that
[quoting newspaper] "would result harm to those individuals and others close to them"
Which of course we wouldn't want.
[quoting newspaper] "through actual or perceived judgement of the effects of their personal vaccination decision"
[quoting newspaper] "the outcome of such analysis, whilst being
uninformative for public health decision making, had the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence at this critical time."
So information regarding this would be uninformative for public health decision making.
So NHS [National Health Service], this is a Freedom of Information response from Public Health Scotland, [quoting document, quoted in newspaper] "We do not have any plans to examine maternal vaccination status, as there is no public health reason to do so."
7:25: [Dr. Campbell turns and faces the camera directly and stares for the next several seconds in grim silence.]
7:26
7:27
7:28
7:29
7:30
7:31
7:32
7:33 So it's reassuring to know, isn't it, that Public Health Scotland can be so confident in the safety of the vaccines.
PS: Paid this one forward too TB. Thank you, again, for your non remunerated, service to humanity. 😁
"So get a load of this. Get a load of this. For almost two years, we shut down an entire country, OK? We spent hundreds of billions of dollars, instilled fear into every man, woman, and child because of a virus. But when it comes to actually asking the Health Department for the part of the sequence that they use to indicate whether or not this virus, someone had a positive response to that virus, they can't provide it because it's "commercial in confidence."
Well, excuse me, but I didn't know that a virus could be patented. Or, am I missing something here? You tell me. Bring on the Royal Commission."
PS You can always contact me at transcriberb ( at) swisscows.email and also, anyone who subscribes (always free) can receive my posts by email and reply to me directly that way.
Speaking for myself though: I have problems with "Dr." John Campbell, both past and present.
I unsubbed from his government narrative and MSM news propaganda "Covid" Youtube channel when it became clear to me that over 2 million lemmings were preparing to follow their leader over a cliff.
1: John Campbell had access to the same data which detractors of the mRNA jabs did. He failed to do his homework.
2: John confidently stood in line to receive the "safe and effective" mRNA concoction thus influencing many of his ill informed "followers" to do the same.
3: A percentage of the people he badly informed and highly influenced may well have died or been permanently injured by these mRNA substances.
John's current tack is replete with stares of "grim face', sarcasm, eye-rolls, pregnant pauses, other deliberate facial gestures and vocal inflections.
His newish backdrop is "follow the evidence" in orange lettering.
(He has removed "where ever it leads.")
His permanent removal of the virtue signaling black masked stuffie dog from his window ledge doesn't give me any more confidence in John Campbell's OWN medical knowledge or expertise.
After being just as gullible as any "non-expert", after enthusiasticly masking himself and his little dog too, and long after being first in line on jab day (similar to Malhotra & his now dead father...) and too little too late to save ANYONE:
John Campbell now parrots stuff he learns from OTHER "experts". Those on the OTHER side of the jab issue. Rather than underlining printed out statements written by CDC, NIH and UK "health authorities".
John now carefully speaks in code, in order to remain compliant with Youtube policies...
He now underlines in green ink data which clearly rejects various government and Big Pharma narratives.
Some folks would like to hold "experts" who are now furiously back peddling ACCOUNTABLE.
I am among them.
#AccountabilityNotAmnesty
John said, in his mea culpa video, "well we didn't know so..."
We knew. They knew. Campbell didn't know though, so let's give him a pass. (KaCHING! With every view, like and comment, John Campbell continues to earn quite a chunk of monthly revenue.)
It took a LOT of folks, working behind the scenes, and behind censorship lines, to turn nurse Campbell's YouTube channel around to what it is today.
Might be fun to track retired nurse John Campbell's YouTube earnings before, and after his channel blew up and he became "an influencer" to 2.9 million followers.
I share your views as you express them in this comment. I don't necessarily wholly approve of every person's testimony or excerpts that I transcribe; I select video to transcribe based on what I believe is its historic importance, and also, I take into consideration what I already have transcribed, such it that it might add something to the rich mosaic that is my List of Transcriptions. I can assure you, I do not necessarily approve of nor support every utterance by every person whose words I transcribe. As for Dr. Campbell, indeed, he was duped when he should have known better, and by promoting them on YT no doubt he led many people to take the jabs; however, I do give him big kudos for waking up, albeit belatedly, and apologizing, and then continuing his work as an educator because all that, that took backbone, major backbone. Simply by showing that backbone, that it may inspire others, he has done a great good. Backbone is what seems to have been in lamentably short supply in recent times.
Give you a hint? Everything the CDC is saying is a lie, the latest variants are a total scam, AND DO NOT TAKE THEIR LATEST POISON DEATH SHOTS!! No matter what they or your employer or government insinuate, allege, promise or threaten!!
oh wow. John Campbell is a good one, he is the only one I could get my skeptical sister to listen to, she said " ah, a very sensible northerner " I liked that he recommended vitamin D and then on top of it added K2 because he was paying attention to what his commenters said!
I wish you all the luck with your one very important job. At this point I am relieved to not have children, I think part of the plan is to make us regret that we are mammals with mammal emotions, so that we will be happy to sign up to the transhumanist agenda and ditch these inconvenient feelings 🫤
Yeah, and that "good one " is qualified by all the things you said in your other comment ... he's a good one in that someone whose thinking is close to his own can listen to what he says...
An apologetically me, we’re in the same boat, my son is in his second year of medical school and I’ve been trying to from the beginning of the whole pandemic madness warn him about what these shots were all about, sadly he got the two Pfizer doses back in 2021 while in his undergraduate school but since he seemed to have realized that it was a mistake to have gotten them although I worry constantly about what he could be coerced to do while in medical school and like you I’m constantly sending links to him to articles like these ones of Dr Campbell’s and praying to God to keep my beloved son as well as so many others in the same situation out of harms way🙏🏻
Correction: *Unapologetically
Sorry, for some reason I couldn’t correct the actual error on my comment
Lol, no worries.
Substack works, or doesn't, in mysterious ways sometimes.
I watched this morning as well, and was going to share, I will just share your piece. Thanks!
You're very welcome Cindy.
I pass your batons too.
Thank you for sharing this. I find what often helps is to point out the censorship-- it has been extreme and powerful (and I often get into the weeds on Missouri v. Biden.) This excerpt transcribed below was not censored, but it's an example of how people, in this case, Dr. Campbell, have often had to go extremes to get around the censors.
Relatedly:
Excess Baby Deaths Investigation
Posted October 20, 2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=wj4rE0LrpR0&t=626s
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: On his popular YouTube channel Dr. John Campbell discusses and educates on matters related to covid. Since the Pfizer document dump https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents starting in 2021 [ https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents ] he has become increasingly alarmed and critical of government policy in regards to covid jabs, however he has always been extremely careful to avoid triggering YouTube's censorship. He uses the word "jag" instead of jab, for example, and in one crucial instance, he simply says nothing while staring pointedly into the camera.
TRANSCRIPT OF BRIEF EXCERPT
5:09
DR. JOHN CAMPBELL: [quoting newspaper] "Covid Scotland"-- This is another well-known Scottish NEWSPAPER, The Herald, reporting-- [quoting newspaper] "Covid Scotland: Vaccines ruled out in neonatal deaths spike" according to this report from the Herald.
[quoting newspaper] "Public health experts ruled out any link between spikes in neonatal deaths and the Covid vaccine".
But the Herald does note, this was [quoting newspaper] "without checking whether any of the infants' mothers had received the jag during pregnancy."
[quoting newspaper] "Experts stressed, no 'plausible' link to justify investigation of maternal vaccination status."
So they're saying there's no need to investigate the mums' vaccine status in these babies that have tragically died in the neonatal period. This is not necessary.
[quoting newspaper] "Public Health Scotland said its consultants had given 'careful consideration' to the 'potential benefits and harms' of carrying out such an analysis as part of its probe into the tragic deaths of 39 infants.'"
But concluded against doing so.
Public Health Scotland added— this is, so the Herald's got this from different bits and bobs from the Freedom of Information requests and other statements. They put it together.
[quoting newspaper] "A risk that 'identifying the vaccination status of the mother, even at aggregate level"
So in other words, that's not individuals [?] numbers, even that
[quoting newspaper] "would result harm to those individuals and others close to them"
Which of course we wouldn't want.
[quoting newspaper] "through actual or perceived judgement of the effects of their personal vaccination decision"
[quoting newspaper] "the outcome of such analysis, whilst being
uninformative for public health decision making, had the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence at this critical time."
So information regarding this would be uninformative for public health decision making.
So NHS [National Health Service], this is a Freedom of Information response from Public Health Scotland, [quoting document, quoted in newspaper] "We do not have any plans to examine maternal vaccination status, as there is no public health reason to do so."
7:25: [Dr. Campbell turns and faces the camera directly and stares for the next several seconds in grim silence.]
7:26
7:27
7:28
7:29
7:30
7:31
7:32
7:33 So it's reassuring to know, isn't it, that Public Health Scotland can be so confident in the safety of the vaccines.
7:41
[END OF EXCERPT]
PS: Paid this one forward too TB. Thank you, again, for your non remunerated, service to humanity. 😁
"So get a load of this. Get a load of this. For almost two years, we shut down an entire country, OK? We spent hundreds of billions of dollars, instilled fear into every man, woman, and child because of a virus. But when it comes to actually asking the Health Department for the part of the sequence that they use to indicate whether or not this virus, someone had a positive response to that virus, they can't provide it because it's "commercial in confidence."
Well, excuse me, but I didn't know that a virus could be patented. Or, am I missing something here? You tell me. Bring on the Royal Commission."
https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/100047.html
Thank you for this, and your kind words.
Wish there were a better way to comment on your latest post other than by tracking you down in comments TB.
Frustrating, time consuming, but doable I suppose. (Found you after a scroll through my inbox...)
Pursuant to your latest McCullough centric post, I went looking for the actual video of his speech.
Found this instead:
https://www.techarp.com/facts/peter-mccullough-eu-parliament/
"They" work hard too...
Thanks, Unapologetically Me.
PS You can always contact me at transcriberb ( at) swisscows.email and also, anyone who subscribes (always free) can receive my posts by email and reply to me directly that way.
Ahhh.
Ok!
Thanks TB. Will do that from this day forward. 😁
I share your data all the time TB.
Speaking for myself though: I have problems with "Dr." John Campbell, both past and present.
I unsubbed from his government narrative and MSM news propaganda "Covid" Youtube channel when it became clear to me that over 2 million lemmings were preparing to follow their leader over a cliff.
1: John Campbell had access to the same data which detractors of the mRNA jabs did. He failed to do his homework.
2: John confidently stood in line to receive the "safe and effective" mRNA concoction thus influencing many of his ill informed "followers" to do the same.
3: A percentage of the people he badly informed and highly influenced may well have died or been permanently injured by these mRNA substances.
John's current tack is replete with stares of "grim face', sarcasm, eye-rolls, pregnant pauses, other deliberate facial gestures and vocal inflections.
His newish backdrop is "follow the evidence" in orange lettering.
(He has removed "where ever it leads.")
His permanent removal of the virtue signaling black masked stuffie dog from his window ledge doesn't give me any more confidence in John Campbell's OWN medical knowledge or expertise.
After being just as gullible as any "non-expert", after enthusiasticly masking himself and his little dog too, and long after being first in line on jab day (similar to Malhotra & his now dead father...) and too little too late to save ANYONE:
John Campbell now parrots stuff he learns from OTHER "experts". Those on the OTHER side of the jab issue. Rather than underlining printed out statements written by CDC, NIH and UK "health authorities".
John now carefully speaks in code, in order to remain compliant with Youtube policies...
He now underlines in green ink data which clearly rejects various government and Big Pharma narratives.
Some folks would like to hold "experts" who are now furiously back peddling ACCOUNTABLE.
I am among them.
#AccountabilityNotAmnesty
John said, in his mea culpa video, "well we didn't know so..."
We knew. They knew. Campbell didn't know though, so let's give him a pass. (KaCHING! With every view, like and comment, John Campbell continues to earn quite a chunk of monthly revenue.)
It took a LOT of folks, working behind the scenes, and behind censorship lines, to turn nurse Campbell's YouTube channel around to what it is today.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnscottlewinski/2020/02/07/uk-doctor-uses-youtube-to-treat-panic-of-coronavirus-myths/
Just saying.
Might be fun to track retired nurse John Campbell's YouTube earnings before, and after his channel blew up and he became "an influencer" to 2.9 million followers.
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9314488
As for me? I'm not giving him a pass.
"The opinions stated here are my own." 😉
I share your views as you express them in this comment. I don't necessarily wholly approve of every person's testimony or excerpts that I transcribe; I select video to transcribe based on what I believe is its historic importance, and also, I take into consideration what I already have transcribed, such it that it might add something to the rich mosaic that is my List of Transcriptions. I can assure you, I do not necessarily approve of nor support every utterance by every person whose words I transcribe. As for Dr. Campbell, indeed, he was duped when he should have known better, and by promoting them on YT no doubt he led many people to take the jabs; however, I do give him big kudos for waking up, albeit belatedly, and apologizing, and then continuing his work as an educator because all that, that took backbone, major backbone. Simply by showing that backbone, that it may inspire others, he has done a great good. Backbone is what seems to have been in lamentably short supply in recent times.
"Backbone is what seems to have been in lamentably short supply in recent times."
A virus made ze virld flip around.
https://youtu.be/1bmEc56Piko
Give you a hint? Everything the CDC is saying is a lie, the latest variants are a total scam, AND DO NOT TAKE THEIR LATEST POISON DEATH SHOTS!! No matter what they or your employer or government insinuate, allege, promise or threaten!!
oh wow. John Campbell is a good one, he is the only one I could get my skeptical sister to listen to, she said " ah, a very sensible northerner " I liked that he recommended vitamin D and then on top of it added K2 because he was paying attention to what his commenters said!
I wish you all the luck with your one very important job. At this point I am relieved to not have children, I think part of the plan is to make us regret that we are mammals with mammal emotions, so that we will be happy to sign up to the transhumanist agenda and ditch these inconvenient feelings 🫤
Yeah, and that "good one " is qualified by all the things you said in your other comment ... he's a good one in that someone whose thinking is close to his own can listen to what he says...